Extracurriculars for a Career in Law
Lawyers advise clients and argue cases in and out of the courtroom. Mock trial, debate, and law-focused summer programs let high schoolers practice legal thinking early.
Find programs that fit you
Programs for a Career in Law
Why it fits: Law and Economics track provides university-level exposure to legal concepts and critical thinking essential for law careers.
Why it fits: Debate develops argumentation, evidence analysis, and persuasive oral advocacy core to legal practice.
Why it fits: Mock legislative sessions and debate develop argumentation and procedural knowledge foundational to law.
Why it fits: Program emphasizes understanding government structures, constitutional law, and public service through meetings with senators and justices.
Why it fits: Debate and negotiation skills developed through arguing policy positions and drafting formal resolutions.
Why it fits: Students explore law through immersive simulations and workshops in legal career tracks.
Why it fits: Students analyze complex ethical and legal questions, construct reasoned arguments, and engage in civil discourse similar to legal practice.
Why it fits: Persuasive writing and critical thinking about government systems and civic principles underpin legal argumentation.
Why it fits: Students observe legislative debates and votes, gaining firsthand insight into how laws are discussed and passed at the national level.
Why it fits: Debate and public speaking skills developed through TARS activities build core competencies for legal practice.
Why it fits: Advocacy work on women's rights and justice issues provides foundational exposure to legal and policy reform.
Why it fits: Campaign work on refugee protection and detained individuals' rights builds foundational legal advocacy skills.
Why it fits: Mock trial directly simulates courtroom advocacy, legal argumentation, and case preparation central to legal practice.
Why it fits: The buzzer-based competition demands quick thinking, argumentation under pressure, and mastery of detailed subject matter across many domains.
Why it fits: Buzzer-based competition requires rapid recall and argumentation similar to legal reasoning and debate.
Why it fits: Essay writing develops critical reasoning and persuasive argumentation essential to legal practice.
Why it fits: Essay competition develops argumentation and reasoning skills essential for legal writing and case analysis.
Why it fits: Essay contests demand logical argumentation and persuasive writing central to legal practice.
Why it fits: Competitive essay writing on philosophical principles strengthens legal argumentation and persuasive writing abilities.
Why it fits: Latin proficiency strengthens understanding of legal terminology and classical rhetoric foundational to legal practice and argumentation.
Why it fits: Posse scholars develop advocacy, persuasive communication, and critical thinking essential to legal practice.
Why it fits: Debate and competitive argumentation formats develop persuasive reasoning and presentation skills essential to law practice.
Why it fits: Debate, persuasive speech, and critical analysis of complex topics build core legal argumentation abilities.
Why it fits: Debate activities and philosophy/critical thinking coursework develop argumentation and logical reasoning skills.
Why it fits: Close reading of classical texts and persuasive argumentation build critical reasoning skills essential to legal practice.
Why it fits: Program emphasizes debate, persuasive argumentation, and understanding legal/governmental procedures and protocols.
Why it fits: Debate training and persuasive communication skills directly support legal argumentation and courtroom advocacy.
Why it fits: Interns gain insider exposure to criminal justice system and participate in mock trial program.
Why it fits: Law & Government courses available at prestigious institutions like Penn Carey Law School.
Why it fits: Law and public policymaking courses introduce students to legal systems and policy analysis relevant to legal practice.
Why it fits: Program teaches responsible citizenship and governmental structure through simulated elections and civic participation.
Why it fits: Course on 'Leadership, Law and Social Movements' directly connects legal advocacy to social change leadership.
Why it fits: Speech and debate competitions directly develop argumentation and persuasive communication skills essential to legal practice.
Why it fits: Students practice debate, argumentation, and understanding legal/governmental frameworks.
Why it fits: Political science foundation and critical thinking skills support legal and political career paths.
Why it fits: Debate develops argumentation and persuasive reasoning skills central to legal practice.
Why it fits: Debate trains argumentation, evidence analysis, and persuasive reasoning core to legal practice.
Why it fits: Oratory and constitutional understanding directly prepare students for legal argumentation and courtroom advocacy.
Why it fits: Students practice debate, argumentation, and advocacy skills while representing constituent views in parliamentary-style proceedings.
Why it fits: Debate develops argumentation, evidence analysis, and persuasive speaking essential to legal practice.
Why it fits: Students develop argumentation and persuasive speaking skills directly applicable to courtroom advocacy and legal reasoning.
Why it fits: Debate and persuasive speaking are core skills for constructing legal arguments and courtroom advocacy.
Why it fits: Debate program builds argumentation, critical thinking, and persuasive communication skills foundational to legal practice.
Why it fits: Program develops skills in analyzing legislation, understanding legal processes, and constructing persuasive written arguments about policy.
Why it fits: Summit focuses on free speech and debate skills central to legal argumentation and courtroom advocacy.
Why it fits: The program emphasizes reading foundational political texts, critical thinking, and persuasive writing skills in discussion-based seminars.
Why it fits: Students develop rigorous argumentation and debate skills directly applicable to legal practice and courtroom advocacy.
Why it fits: Debate competitions develop argumentation, evidence analysis, and persuasive advocacy skills central to legal practice.
Why it fits: Debaters develop argumentation and persuasion skills directly applicable to courtroom advocacy and legal reasoning.
Why it fits: Debating competition develops argumentation, evidence evaluation, and reasoning skills central to legal practice and courtroom advocacy.
Why it fits: Mock trial preparation and courtroom observation directly mirror legal practice and advocacy work.
Why it fits: Program involves legal proceedings, debate, and understanding governmental structures and democratic principles.
Why it fits: Students participate in mock trials as lawyers, examining legal issues and constitutional law interpretation directly.
Why it fits: Academy explores civil, economic, and human rights through engagement with organizations and develops advocacy skills for justice work.
Why it fits: Persuasive argumentation and critical analysis of complex topics like law and social movements are core to legal practice.
Why it fits: International Relations and Law courses provide foundational knowledge for legal practice and policy work.
Why it fits: Writing persuasive arguments about textual meaning and personal impact mirrors legal brief writing and advocacy.
Why it fits: College-level seminars emphasize critical reading, writing, and discussion skills essential to legal analysis.
Why it fits: Debate directly develops argumentation, evidence analysis, and persuasive oral advocacy skills central to legal practice.
Why it fits: Debate develops argumentation, evidence analysis, and persuasive oral advocacy core to legal practice.
Why it fits: Debate competitions develop argumentation, evidence analysis, and persuasive communication skills essential to legal practice.
Why it fits: HLI provides training in mediation, conflict resolution, and human rights expertise central to legal practice.
Why it fits: Direct hands-on legal work with practicing attorneys in real legal settings provides foundational experience in legal practice and case work.